VALUE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-ENABLED QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (AI-QCT) IN ENHANCING DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY AND RISK STRATIFICATION OF CORONARY PLAQUE ON CCTA

Hồ Trần Bảo Nhi 1 , , Trần Bảo Ngọc , Trần Thanh Ngọc , Bùi Xuân Khải
1 University of Health Sciences, VNU-HCM
* Corresponding author:

Article Information

Metrics
Downloads: 0 Views: 0
Published
2026-06-07
Section
Review Article
Categories

Download Article

How to Cite

1.
Bảo Nhi HT, Bảo Ngọc T, Thanh Ngọc T, Xuân Khải B. VALUE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-ENABLED QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (AI-QCT) IN ENHANCING DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY AND RISK STRATIFICATION OF CORONARY PLAQUE ON CCTA. JHA [Internet]. Vietnam; 2026 Jun. 7 [cited 2026 Jun. 18];2(8):34–41. https://tcsuckhoelaohoa.vn/bvtn/article/view/198 doi: 10.63947/bvtn.v2i8.5
Loading...
Loading citation...

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the role of Artificial Intelligence-enabled Quantitative Computed Tomography (AI-QCT) in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and risk stratification compared to manual assessment using the CAD-RADS 2.0 standard in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery stenosis (<50%) via Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA). Data were extracted from PubMed, ResearchGate, and ScienceDirect over the past six years. Selection criteria focused on clinical studies involving AI-QCT, high-risk plaque (HRP) characteristics, and the CAD-RADS 2.0 system. Results indicated that AI-QCT delivers superior performance, with sensitivity in detecting high-risk plaques ranging from 85% to 94%. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) for cardiovascular risk stratification reached 0.8 to 0.93. The integration of AI-QCT into CCTA analysis and the CAD-RADS 2.0 framework holds a dual strategic value: eradicating subjective bias to optimize risk stratification, while establishing a core foundation for personalizing preventive therapies and enhancing long-term clinical outcomes.

Keywords

AI-QCT risk stratification vulnerable plaque CAD-RADS 2.0 non-obstructive coronary artery disease CCTA

References

  1. Damluji AA, Nanna MG, Mason P, Lowenstern A, Orkaby AR, Washam JB, et al. Coronary Artery Revascularization in the Older Adult Population: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2025;152:e494–525. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001387
  2. Çelik MC, Kalçık M, Birgün A, Yetim M, Bekar L, Karavelioğlu Y. Endothelial dysfunction and vascular stiffness: molecular drivers of cardiovascular aging. Explor Cardiol 2025;3:101279. https://doi.org/10.37349/ec.2025.101279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37349/ec.2025.101279
  3. Vink AS, A.M. Beijk M. The Treatment of Complex Coronary Artery Disease. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2025;26:46214. https://doi.org/10.31083/RCM46214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31083/RCM46214
  4. Caractéristiques angiographiques des septuagénaires hospitalisés n.d. https://studylibfr.com/doc/2482372/caract%C3%A9ristiques-angiographiques-des-septuag%C3%A9naires-hospi. (accessed May 2, 2026).
  5. Các tiến bộ trong chẩn đoán và điều trị bệnh mạch vành | Tim mạch học | Hội Tim mạch học thành phố Hồ Chí Minh 2025. https://timmachhoc.vn/cac-tien-bo-trong-chan-doan-va-dieu-tri-benh-mach-vanh/ (accessed May 2, 2026).
  6. Inflammatory risk and cardiovascular events in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease: the ORFAN multicentre, longitudinal cohort study - The Lancet n.d. https://www.thelancet.com/article/S0140-6736%2824%2900596-8/fulltext (accessed May 2, 2026).
  7. Nonobstructive coronary atherosclerosis is associated with adverse prognosis among patients diagnosed with myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary arteries - Atherosclerosis n.d. https://www.atherosclerosis-journal.com/article/S0021-9150(23)00006-0/abstract (accessed May 2, 2026).
  8. CAD-RADSTM 2.0 - 2022 Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System - Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography n.d. https://www.journalofcardiovascularct.com/article/S1934-5925%2822%2900240-4/fulltext (accessed May 2, 2026).
  9. Celeng C, Takx RAP. Moving towards a uniform diagnosis of coronary artery disease on coronary CTA. Neth Heart J 2024;32:378–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-024-01903-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-024-01903-6
  10. SCCT Expert Consensus Document Provides Measurable Standard for Cardiac CT Angiography - Cardiac Interventions Today n.d. https://c4v8.citoday.com/news/scct-expert-consensus-document-provides-measurable-standard-for-cardiac-ct-angiography (accessed May 2, 2026).
  11. Large Language Models Versus Human Readers in CAD-RADS 2.0 Categorization of Coronary CT Angiography Reports | Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Springer Nature Link n.d. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10278-025-01704-2 (accessed May 2, 2026).
  12. CCTA Study: Plaque Burden Offers No Prognostic Benefit for Predicting Cardiac Events in Patients with Acute Chest Pain | Diagnostic Imaging n.d. https://www.diagnosticimaging.com/view/ccta-study-plaque-burden-no-prognostic-benefit-predicting-cardiac-events-acute-chest-pain (accessed May 2, 2026).
  13. Pinna A, Boi A, Mannelli L, Balestrieri A, Sanfilippo R, Suri J, et al. Machine Learning for Coronary Plaque Characterization: A Multimodal Review of OCT, IVUS, and CCTA. Diagnostics 2025;15:1822. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15141822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15141822
  14. Artificial Intelligence–based Coronary Plaque Quantification Using Coronary CT Angiography: Current Insights and Future DirectionsRadiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging n.d. https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/ryct.240568 (accessed May 2, 2026).
  15. Prognostic Value of AI-Based Quantitative Coronary CTA vs Human Reader-Based Visual Assessment: Results From the CONFIRM2 Registry | JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging n.d. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jcmg.2025.09.021 (accessed May 2, 2026).
  16. Arterial Occlusive Disease | Assessment of atherosclerotic plaque burden: comparison of AI-QCT versus SIS, CAC, visual and CAD-RADS stenosis categories | springermedicine.com n.d. https://www.springermedicine.com/arterial-occlusive-disease/artificial-intelligence/assessment-of-atherosclerotic-plaque-burden-comparison-of-ai-qct/26990712 (accessed May 2, 2026).
  17. Choi AD, Marques H, Kumar V, Griffin WF, Rahban H, Karlsberg RP, et al. CT Evaluation by Artificial Intelligence for Atherosclerosis, Stenosis and Vascular Morphology (CLARIFY): A Multi-center, international study. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography 2021;15:470–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2021.05.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2021.05.004
  18. Bär S, Knuuti J, Saraste A, Klén R, Kero T, Nabeta T, et al. Derivation and validation of an artificial intelligence-based plaque burden safety cut-off for long-term acute coronary syndrome from coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2025;26:1163–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaf121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaf121
  19. AI-Quantitative CT Coronary Plaque Features Associate With a Higher Relative Risk in Women: CONFIRM2 Registry | Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging n.d. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.125.018235 (accessed May 2, 2026).
  20. Han X, Luo N, Xu L, Cao J, Guo N, He Y, et al. Artificial intelligence stenosis diagnosis in coronary CTA: effect on the performance and consistency of readers with less cardiovascular experience. BMC Med Imaging 2022;22:28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00756-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00756-y
  21. Ihdayhid AR, Sehly A, He A, Joyner J, Flack J, Konstantopoulos J, et al. Coronary Artery Stenosis and High-Risk Plaque Assessed With an Unsupervised Fully Automated Deep Learning Technique. JACC Adv 2024;3:100861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100861
  22. Parsa S, Peng AW, Bell J, Sengupta S, Mullen S, Rogers C, et al. Artificial intelligence-enabled coronary plaque quantification for personalized risk assessment and lipid-lowering therapy: Insights from the FISH&CHIPS study✰. American Journal of Preventive Cardiology 2026;26:101452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpc.2026.101452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpc.2026.101452
  23. Super-Resolution Deep Learning Reconstruction for Coronary CT Angiography: Coronary Stenosis Assessment and CAD-RADS Reclassification | Radiology n.d. https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/radiol.252163 (accessed May 2, 2026).
  24. The Plaque Analysis Classifies the Coronary Artery Disease‐Reporting and Data System (CAD‐RADS) Stenosis and Plaque Burden Categories: Association of the Plaque Features, Fat Attenuation Index, Coronary Computed Tomography Fractional Flow Reserve, and the Combination of Stenosis and Calcification - Chen - 2024 - Clinical Cardiology - Wiley Online Library n.d. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/clc.24305 (accessed May 2, 2026).
  25. Brendel JM, Walterspiel J, Hagen F, Kübler J, Brendlin AS, Afat S, et al. Coronary artery disease detection using deep learning and ultrahigh-resolution photon-counting coronary CT angiography. Diagn Interv Imaging 2025;106:68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2024.09.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2024.09.012
  26. Huang Z, Xiao J, Wang X, Li Z, Guo N, Hu Y, et al. Clinical Evaluation of the Automatic Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Using Convolutional Neural Networks. Academic Radiology 2023;30:698–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2022.05.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2022.05.015

License

© 2026 The Author(s). Published by Journal of Health and Aging.