EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF AN INTERVENTION ON SURFACE CLEANING QUALITY USING THE FLUORESCENT MARKER METHOD IN TWO DEPARTMENS – THE DEPARTMENT OF VIP AND THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (SERVICE SECTOR) AT THONG NHAT HOSPITAL

Lê Thị Hải Xuân 1 , , Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Ánh 1 , Nguyễn Trần Quỳnh Như 1 , Lê Đình Thanh 1
1 Thong Nhat Hospital image/svg+xml
* Corresponding author:

Article Information

Metrics
Downloads: 0 Views: 0
Published
2026-06-07
Section
Original Research
Categories

Download Article

How to Cite

1.
Thị Hải Xuân L, Thị Ngọc Ánh N, Trần Quỳnh Như N, Đình Thanh L. EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF AN INTERVENTION ON SURFACE CLEANING QUALITY USING THE FLUORESCENT MARKER METHOD IN TWO DEPARTMENS – THE DEPARTMENT OF VIP AND THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (SERVICE SECTOR) AT THONG NHAT HOSPITAL. JHA [Internet]. Vietnam; 2026 Jun. 7 [cited 2026 Jun. 18];2(8):134–140. https://tcsuckhoelaohoa.vn/bvtn/article/view/214 doi: 10.63947/bvtn.v2i8.19
Loading...
Loading citation...

Abstract

The objective of this study was to use the fluorescent marker method to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention aimed at improving environmental surface cleaning quality, while also investigating the correlation between cleaning staff’s awareness of protocols and the adequate provision of cleaning supplies (wipes and chemicals) at Thong Nhat Hospital. Subjects and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study with intervention was conducted on 446 high-touch surface locations at the Department of Internal Medicine (Service sector) and the Department of VIP (Senior Officials Treatment). Hygiene quality was assessed using the fluorescent marker method, comparing results before and after interventions that included staff retraining on knowledge and the supplementation of cleaning tools (wipes). Results: The proportion of completely cleaned surfaces increased significantly from 45.6% pre-intervention to 79.4% post-intervention. Post-intervention cleanliness rates across surface groups ranged from 63.8% to 89.2%, significantly higher than the pre-intervention range (22.8% - 62.3%). Additionally, the percentage of staff mastering the protocols rose from 68% to 82%, and the average number of wipes used per room increased from 2.42 to 3.63. Conclusion: The fluorescent marker method serves as an objective tool that reflects the actual quality of environmental hygiene more accurately than visual observation. The findings confirm the positive impact of knowledge training and the provision of adequate cleaning supplies in improving hospital surface cleaning quality.

Keywords

Fluorescent marker surface cleaning quality cleaning staff knowledge intervention wipes Thong Nhat Hospital

References

  1. Bộ Y tế. Quyết định số 1886/QĐ-BYT: Kế hoạch hành động quốc gia về kiểm soát nhiễm khuẩn trong các cơ sở khám bệnh, chữa bệnh giai đoạn 2016–2020. Hà Nội: Bộ Y tế; 2016.
  2. Bộ Y tế. Quyết định số 3671/QĐ-BYT: Hướng dẫn phòng ngừa chuẩn trong cơ sở khám bệnh, chữa bệnh. Hà Nội: Bộ Y tế; 2012.
  3. Bộ Y tế. Quyết định số 3916/QĐ-BYT: Hướng dẫn vệ sinh môi trường bề mặt trong các cơ sở khám bệnh. Hà Nội: Bộ Y tế; 2017.
  4. Nguyễn Thị Hồng Vân. Sử dụng phương pháp đánh dấu huỳnh quang khảo sát hiệu quả công tác làm sạch các vị trí tiếp xúc thường xuyên tại phòng bệnh, phòng thủ thuật, phòng hồi sức, Bệnh viện Đại học Y Dược TP.HCM. Báo cáo tại Hội nghị Kiểm soát nhiễm khuẩn TP. Hồ Chí Minh; tháng 12, 2016.
  5. Asia Pacific Society of Infection Control (APSIC). Guidelines for Environmental Cleaning and Decontamination. APSIC; 2013.
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Options for Evaluating Environmental Cleaning. Level II, Appendix B: Objective Methods for Evaluating Environmental Hygiene. CDC; 2010.
  7. Nguyễn Trần Quỳnh Như, cùng cộng sự. Đánh giá chất lượng vệ sinh bề mặt bằng phương pháp đánh dấu huỳnh quang tại 02 khoa: Nội Điều Trị Theo Yêu Cầu và Điều Trị Cán Bộ Cao Cấp Bệnh viện Thống Nhất. Tạp chí Y học Cộng đồng. 2024;65(CĐ 10 năm). DOI: https://doi.org/10.52163/yhc.v65iCD10.1652

License

© 2026 The Author(s). Published by Journal of Health and Aging.