PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE OF THE HIP

Võ Thành Toàn 1 ,
1 Thong Nhat Hospital
* Corresponding author:

Article Information

Metrics
Downloads: 0 Views: 0
Published
2025-06-15
Section
Review
Categories

Download Article

How to Cite

1.
Thành Toàn V. PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE OF THE HIP. JHA [Internet]. Vietnam; 2025 Jun. 15 [cited 2025 Jun. 23];1(2):17–33. https://tcsuckhoelaohoa.vn/bvtn/article/view/32 doi: 10.63947/bvtn.v1i2.2
Loading...
Loading citation...

Abstract

Periprosthetic fractures of the hip are serious complications following total hip arthroplasty, particularly affecting elderly patients, those with osteoporosis, or individuals with a history of revision surgeries. These fractures may occur intraoperatively or postoperatively, involving the femoral shaft (classified as Vancouver A, B, or C) or the acetabulum (Paprosky classification). Acetabular fractures are less common than femoral fractures. The mechanisms of fracture involve both biological factors (such as stress risers, implant loosening, and poor bone quality) and external forces (such as falls, torsional, and bending loads). Identified risk factors include advanced age, female gender, osteoporosis, implant loosening, use of cementless femoral stems, rheumatoid arthritis, and multiple revision surgeries. Studies have reported the incidence of periprosthetic fractures after primary hip replacement ranging from 0.8% to 4.5%, with higher rates observed following revision procedures. Diagnosis relies on both clinical and paraclinical assessments, with plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) being the primary tools to evaluate implant stability, bone loss, and to guide treatment planning. Treatment depends on the type of fracture and the stability of the prosthesis. Stable Vancouver A fractures may be managed conservatively; Vancouver B1 fractures often require internal fixation with plates and screws; B2 and B3 fractures typically necessitate revision with a long-stem prosthesis and bone grafting if needed. Nondisplaced acetabular fissure fractures may be treated conservatively, but displaced or unstable fractures require surgical reconstruction using plates, screws, bone grafts, or specialized acetabular components. Prognosis is influenced by patient age, the severity of osteoporosis, prosthesis stability, and the number of prior surgeries. The mortality rate following periprosthetic hip fractures ranges from 7% to 18% within the first year postoperatively. Prevention, thorough risk assessment, and appropriate treatment strategies play crucial roles in improving clinical outcomes.

Keywords

periprosthetic fracture risk factors Vancouver classification Lewis-Rorabeck Wright-Cofield surgical treatment prevention osteoporosis

References

  1. Paul Tornetta, Robert F Ostrum, Michael D McKee, et al (2025). Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults – 10th Ed. Wolters Kluwer Health.
  2. Timothy O White, Samuel P Mackenzie (2023). McRae's Orthopaedic Trauma and Emergency Fracture Management – 4th Ed. Elsevier.
  3. GS Kulkarni (2016). Textbook of Orthopedics and Trauma – 3rd Ed. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
  4. Sam W Wiesel, Todd Albert (2015). Operative Techniques in Orthopaedic Surgery – 3rd Ed. LWW.
  5. Soliman Md Mohiuddin, Islam Mohammad, Alqahtani Abdulrahman et al (2023). Advancement in Total Hip Implant: A Comprehensive Review of Mechanics and Performance Parameters Across Diverse Novelties. Journal of Materials Chemistry B. 10.1039/D3TB01469J.
  6. Yi P H, Della Valle C J, Fishman E K, et al (2020). Imaging of Periprosthetic Fractures of the Hip and Knee. Seminars in Roentgenology. doi:10.1053/j.ro.2020.07.015
  7. Chitre A, Wynn Jones H, Shah N, et al (2013). Complications of total hip arthroplasty: periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum. Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 6, 357-363.

License

© 2025 Journal of Health and Aging - Thong Nhat Hospital