Surgical Intervention in Osteoporosis: Follow-up, Management of Fracture Patients, and the Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) Model

Võ Thành Toàn 1, 2 ,
1 Thong Nhat Hospital image/svg+xml
2 University of Health Sciences image/svg+xml
* Corresponding author:

Download Article

How to Cite

1.
Võ TT. Surgical Intervention in Osteoporosis: Follow-up, Management of Fracture Patients, and the Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) Model. JHA [Internet]. Vietnam; 2026 Oct. 1 [cited 2026 Oct. 16];2(9):11–21. https://tcsuckhoelaohoa.vn/bvtn/article/view/259 doi: 10.63947/bvtn.v2i9.2
Loading...
Loading citation...

Abstract

Osteoporotic fractures in older adults represent a highly complex clinical challenge, requiring systematic and multidisciplinary coordination among orthopedic surgery, geriatrics, and metabolic bone specialists. Clinical evidence indicates that immediately following an initial fragility fracture, the risk of sustaining subsequent fractures escalates dramatically, particularly within the critical window of the first 1 to 2 years. Despite these severe consequences, a vast majority of patients in current practice remain significantly under-evaluated and undertreated for their underlying osteoporosis. This comprehensive review aims to systematically update the core principles of surgical intervention for osteoporotic fractures, effective perioperative management protocols, and specifically highlight the strategic implementation of the Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) model. FLS has been clinically proven as an exceptionally effective, structured, and coordinated care model that optimizes the entire patient management pathway, significantly enhances long-term treatment adherence, actively prevents secondary fragility fractures, reduces associated mortality rates, and lowers overall healthcare costs. Widespread adoption and expansion of the FLS framework serve as an essential and vital solution to establishing a standardized system for continuous, comprehensive, and high-quality care for osteoporotic patients throughout Vietnam.

Keywords

Osteoporosis osteoporotic fracture surgical management Fracture Liaison Service perioperative management secondary fracture prevention

References

  1. Gass, M. and B. Dawson-Hughes, Preventing Osteoporosis-Related Fractures: An Overview. The American Journal of Medicine, 2006. 119(4): p. S3-S11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.12.017
  2. Nuti, R., et al., Guidelines for the management of osteoporosis and fragility fractures. Internal and Emergency Medicine, 2019. 14(1): p. 85-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-018-1874-2
  3. Kim, J.H., et al., Surgical treatment of severe osteoporosis including new concept of advanced severe osteoporosis. Osteoporos Sarcopenia, 2017. 3(4): p. 164-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afos.2017.11.006
  4. (NICE), N.I.f.H.a.C.E. Hip fracture: management. NICE Clinical Guideline [CG124]. London: NICE; 2023 [updated 2023 Jan 10]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg124.
  5. (AAOS)., A.A.o.O.S. Management of hip fractures in older adults. Evidence-based clinical practice guideline. Rosemont (IL): AAOS; 2021. Available from: https://www.aaos.org/quality/quality-programs/lower-extremity-programs/hip-fractures-in-the-elderly/.
  6. Simunovic, N., et al., Effect of early surgery after hip fracture on mortality and complications: systematic review and meta-analysis. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2010. 182: p. 1609 - 1616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.092220
  7. Hollensteiner, M., et al., Biomechanics of Osteoporotic Fracture Fixation. Current Osteoporosis Reports, 2019. 17(6): p. 363-374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-019-00535-9
  8. Aneja, A., R.J. Teasdall, and M.L. Graves, Biomechanics of Osteoporotic Fracture Care: Advances in Locking Plate and Intramedullary Nail Technology. J Orthop Trauma, 2021. 35(Suppl 5): p. S1-s5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002228
  9. Kammerlander, C., et al., Cement augmentation of the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) – A multicentre randomized controlled trial. Injury, 2018. 49(8): p. 1436-1444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.04.022
  10. Jang, H.-D., et al., Current Concepts in the Management of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: A Narrative Review. Asian Spine J, 2020. 14(6): p. 898-909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0594
  11. Kallmes David, F., et al., A Randomized Trial of Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Spinal Fractures. New England Journal of Medicine. 361(6): p. 569-579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0900563
  12. Firanescu, C.E., et al., Vertebroplasty versus sham procedure for painful acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VERTOS IV): randomised sham controlled clinical trial. BMJ, 2018. 361: p. k1551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k1551
  13. Buchbinder, R., et al., A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med, 2009. 361(6): p. 557-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0900429
  14. Ong, J., et al., Bone Health, Fragility Fractures, and the Hand Surgeon. J Hand Surg Glob Online, 2025. 7(3): p. 100709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.02.002
  15. Slobogean, G.P., et al., A scoping review of the proximal humerus fracture literature. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2015. 16(1): p. 112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0564-8
  16. Gregson, C.L., et al., UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Archives of Osteoporosis, 2022. 17(1): p. 58.
  17. Chandran, M., et al., Impact of osteoporosis and osteoporosis medications on fracture healing: a narrative review. Osteoporosis International, 2024. 35(8): p. 1337-1358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-024-07059-8
  18. Shin, Y., W.C. Shin, and J.W. Kim, Effect of Osteoporosis Medication on Fracture Healing: An Evidence Based Review. Journal of Bone Metabolism, 2020. 27: p. 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11005/jbm.2020.27.1.15
  19. Johnell, O., et al., Management of the patient after an osteoporotic fracture: Guidelines for orthopedic surgeons--consensus conference on Treatment of Osteoporosis for Orthopedic Surgeons, Nordic Orthopedic Federation, Tampere, Finland 2000. Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica, 2001. 72: p. 325-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/000164701753541952
  20. Le, H.V., et al., Fracture liaison service—a multidisciplinary approach to osteoporosis management. Osteoporosis International, 2024. 35(10): p. 1719-1727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-024-07181-7
  21. Kates, S.L. and T. Miclau, The fracture liaison service: its history, current state, how it works, and future directions. OTA Int, 2022. 5(3 Suppl): p. e192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000192
  22. Mazza, O., et al., Inpatient rehabilitation fracture liaison service (FLS) improves outcomes for secondary prevention of hip fractures. Bone Reports, 2025. 26: p. 101869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bonr.2025.101869
  23. Andreasen, C., et al., Fracture liaison service (FLS) is associated with lower subsequent fragility fracture risk and mortality: NoFRACT (the Norwegian capture the fracture initiative). Osteoporosis International, 2025. 36(3): p. 501-512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-024-07376-y
  24. Stolnicki, B., et al., How to initiate and develop Fracture Liaison Services (FLS). Recommendations from the IOF Capture the Fracture® FLS Mentors in Brazil. Archives of Osteoporosis, 2022. 17(1): p. 63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-022-01108-7
  25. Võ, T.T., P.V.T. Đặng, and T.S. Nguyễn, Đánh giá thời gian liền xương sau phẫu thuật kết hợp xương ở bệnh nhân gãy xương có loãng xương. Tạp chí Sức khỏe và Lão hóa, 2025. 1(1): p. 52-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.63947/bvtn.v1i1.7

License

© 2026 The Author(s). Published by Journal of Health and Aging.